Ellen Moir

Ellen Moir

Like school districts all beyond the land, California'south are figuring out the best way to evaluate teachers. The stark reality is that some districts will exist successful in this, and others will non.

Whether a commune's teacher evaluation system works or not will depend on a few things: whether the organization is correctly conceived of and designed, how well the system is implemented, and, afterwards evaluation, the district'due south level of delivery to ongoing teacher learning.

First and foremost, an evaluation organization must be designed with the finish goal in mind: to ameliorate teacher effectiveness and student learning. If this sounds also obvious, take a wait at the Eye for American Progress' caption almost how some states accept viewed evaluation as a means for firing and so-chosen "bad" teachers, as a silver-bullet-style quick fix to dramatically meliorate education in the nation. It is naive to view evaluation solely as a ways to rank teachers and make hiring and firing decisions. Fortunately, the fence is changing.  It is rising up to meet those of the states who have long advocated that the best way to improve educatee learning is to continuously focus on advancing the instructional do of teachers. Evaluation systems conceived nether this philosophy will be the most likely to succeed.

Second, an evaluation arrangement must be designed and implemented well. To u.s. at New Instructor Center (NTC), that ways:

  • Information technology is tied to standards and ensures educator functioning is assessed against those standards;
  • Information technology is informed past data from a variety of sources, including measures of student learning and growth;
  • It is a priority within the district, with dedicated time, training, and support provided to evaluators;
  • Information technology differentiates based on a instructor'southward level of experience or individual needs;
  • It meets legal and ethical standards for employment decisions; and
  • Information technology is supported by the larger organization (commune, school lath, union, etc.) that allocates sufficient time and resources to make it a developmental and meaningful experience not but for the educator being evaluated, but likewise for the evaluator.

As the dialogue on teacher evaluation has moved from gotcha to growth, teachers have warmed to the idea of evaluations, provided that they comprise the above, are based on multiple measures, and are done by evaluators who have had the necessary professional development to ensure, as best as possible, evaluations are off-white and objective. Grooming for evaluators (for example, how to notice a classroom and how to provide meaningful feedback) is the first form of professional person evolution that will contribute to the success of evaluation systems.

Lastly, there needs to be a commitment to educators' ongoing learning. Personalized professional person learning plans should exist created for each instructor equally the final phase of any evaluation procedure. These plans should point teachers toward specific and highly relevant learning opportunities that allow them to address areas of instructional weakness. This will simply happen when those responsible for evaluating, coaching, and mentoring teachers and principals are trained in the art of providing meaningful, developmental feedback, encouraging reflection, and creating opportunities for professional growth.

The New Teacher Center has been doing this work for years with new teachers and principals. Past working with us to provide new educators with the targeted back up, meaningful feedback and relevant learning opportunities they need, our district partners benefit from remarkably constructive new teachers and principals who improve student learning and remain committed to the profession.

It'due south critical that districts find ways to build these same principles into their evaluation systems considering, when information technology comes downwards to it, a district's teacher evaluation system will succeed or neglect based on its ability to meliorate teaching. And nosotros tin can't afford to permit California districts fail on this.

Ellen Moir is founder and primary executive officer of the New Teacher Heart, a national nonprofit organization that she created in 1998 to meliorate student learning by accelerating the effectiveness of teachers and schoolhouse leaders, peculiarly in underserved areas. Today this system has a staff of over 150 who work closely with educators and policymakers across the country to ensure that the nation's low-income, minority, and English language language learners – those students almost oft taught past inexperienced teachers – have the opportunity to receive an splendid education.

To get more reports like this one, click hither to sign up for EdSource's no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.